Getting ready for your BCBA exam? You’re in the right place.
I created RBTExamPrep.com to give you the most realistic BCBA mock exam experience possible 185 questions designed to feel just like the real thing.
My goal isn’t just to help you pass, but to help you understand every concept deeply.
Whether you get a question right or wrong, you’ll see detailed feedback explaining why, so you’ll be ready for that type next time. I want you to walk into test day feeling confident, calm, and prepared.
Many students have shared that these questions felt almost identical to the real exam and that’s exactly what I was aiming for. I’d love to hear how you did please share your score in the comments below! It really helps encourage others who are preparing for the exam. 🙂
I built this site to keep high-quality BCBA prep resources free and accessible for everyone, which is why it’s supported by ads. If it helped you, it’d mean a lot if you shared it with your peers.
If you want to keep practicing, check out the BCBA section for more tests and study materials!
Bookmark this site using Ctrl + D or tap ‘Add to Favorites’ on your mobile browser.
Results
#1. Cindy, a teacher of a gifted and talented class, aims to promote teamwork among her students by implementing a group contingency for homework assignments. While her students are academically proficient, there have been observed instances of bullying among classmates. Given these social dynamics, which type of group contingency should Cindy most likely avoid to prevent exacerbating negative social interactions or potential harm to students?
A Dependent Group Contingency often referred to as a Hero Contingency is a type of group contingency where reinforcement for the entire group is contingent upon the performance of one or a small subset of individuals within that group In a class where bullying is already a documented concern implementing this type of contingency carries a significant ethical risk If the hero students fail to meet the required criterion they could become targets for increased bullying intense peer pressure and social ostracization from the rest of the group who then miss out on the shared reinforcement This outcome directly conflicts with the ethical responsibility of behavior analysts and educators to do no harm and to protect the welfare and dignity of all individuals Independent contingencies hold each student accountable for their own behavior thus minimizing blame Interdependent contingencies distribute responsibility among all members fostering collective effort but also potentially peer pressure Natural group contingencies are not contrived and therefore are not a type of contrived contingency that would be intentionally selected or avoided in this context
Bookmark this site using Ctrl + D or tap ‘Add to Favorites’ on your mobile browser.