Getting ready for your BCBA exam? You’re in the right place.
I created RBTExamPrep.com to give you the most realistic BCBA mock exam experience possible 185 questions designed to feel just like the real thing.
My goal isn’t just to help you pass, but to help you understand every concept deeply.
Whether you get a question right or wrong, you’ll see detailed feedback explaining why, so you’ll be ready for that type next time. I want you to walk into test day feeling confident, calm, and prepared.
Many students have shared that these questions felt almost identical to the real exam and that’s exactly what I was aiming for. I’d love to hear how you did please share your score in the comments below! It really helps encourage others who are preparing for the exam. 🙂
I built this site to keep high-quality BCBA prep resources free and accessible for everyone, which is why it’s supported by ads. If it helped you, it’d mean a lot if you shared it with your peers.
If you want to keep practicing, check out the BCBA section for more tests and study materials!
Bookmark this site using Ctrl + D or tap ‘Add to Favorites’ on your mobile browser.
Results
#1. A client engages in frequent tantrum behaviors, which a functional assessment has determined are maintained by socially mediated tangible reinforcement (e.g., access to preferred toys or snacks provided by an adult). The behavior analyst wants to develop an antecedent intervention to manipulate the Motivating Operation (MO) for this specific reinforcer, thereby decreasing the likelihood of tantrums. Which of the following interventions would be the most appropriate strategy for the analyst to implement?
The question specifically asks for an antecedent intervention to manipulate the Motivating Operation MO for socially mediated tangible reinforcement The text explains that to manipulate an MO for reinforcement one should think of deprivation and satiation Option C describes NonContingent Reinforcement NCR with tangibles By providing noncontingent ie not dependent on behavior access to preferred tangibles on a timebased schedule the MO for tangible items is abolished satiation occurs This makes the client less motivated to engage in tantrum behavior to gain those tangibles because they are already freely available Option A addresses an escape function by following through with a demand the client escapes the demand if the behavior was escapemaintained Option B describes NCR for attention which would be appropriate if the tantrums were attentionmaintained not tangiblemaintained Option D describes a punishment procedure which is a consequencebased intervention not an antecedent manipulation of the MO and is generally not the first line of intervention
Bookmark this site using Ctrl + D or tap ‘Add to Favorites’ on your mobile browser.


