The heart of ABA lies in its commitment to individualized care. No two learners are identical, and therefore, no two therapy plans should be either. Assessments are the instruments we use to honor this individuality. They provide objective, measurable data that illuminate:

• Learner Preferences: What genuinely interests and motivates the individual?
• Skill Repertoires: What can the learner currently do independently (their baseline)? What skills are emerging? Where are the significant gaps that therapy should address?
• Potential Barriers: What factors might be hindering learning or participation?
• Behavioral Functions: Why does a particular challenging behavior occur? What purpose does it serve for that individual in that context?

Without this thorough understanding, interventions might be ineffective, inefficient, or worse, mismatched to the learner’s actual needs. Your active participation in assessment ensures the therapeutic journey is well-navigated, purposeful, and ultimately, successful. Let’s break down the specific tasks.

---

B-1: Conduct Preference Assessments

What Exactly is a Preference Assssment?

At its heart, a preference assessment is a systematic procedure we use to identify stimuli (that’s just a fancy ABA term for items, activities, or even types of attention) that a person prefers. We’re essentially trying to figure out: “Given a choice, what does this individual gravitate towards?”

Think about it in your own life. If someone offered you a choice between $100 cash, a spa day, or tickets to see your favorite band, you likely have a preference. You might like all three, but one probably stands out as the most preferred. That’s what we’re trying to uncover for our clients.

Why is this so Important? The Preference-Reinforcer Link

Here’s the critical connection: things that individuals prefer are more likely to function as reinforcers. Remember, a reinforcer is anything that, when delivered after a behavior, increases the likelihood that the behavior will happen again in the future.

So, if we know that little Maya absolutely loves playing with bubbles, we can hypothesize that access to bubbles might be a powerful reinforcer for her. We could then try using bubbles as a reward (a consequence) when she, say, follows an instruction or communicates a request appropriately. If those behaviors start happening more often because we’re providing bubbles afterwards, then voila! Bubbles have functioned as a reinforcer in that specific situation.

Are Preferences and Reinforcers the Same Thing?

Excellent question! This is a subtle but super important distinction.

• A preference assessment identifies things the person likes or chooses. It tells us about their potential interests.
• A reinforcer assessment (which often follows a preference assessment) actually tests whether one of those preferred items or activities will increase a specific behavior when used as a consequence.

Think of it this way: Preference assessments give us a list of potential candidates for reinforcement. Reinforcer assessments confirm which candidates actually do the job of strengthening behavior. You might prefer chocolate cake over vanilla, but if you just ate a huge meal, even your highly preferred chocolate cake might not motivate you (reinforce your behavior) to, say, clean your room right then. Context matters!

For the RBT exam and your daily practice, you primarily need to be skilled in conducting preference assessments to identify those potential reinforcers. Your supervising BCBA will typically guide the reinforcer assessment process.

Types of Preference Assessments

We don’t just randomly ask clients what they like (though sometimes informal conversation can give us clues!). We use structured methods to get more reliable information. Here are the main types you’ll need to know:

1. Asking the Person (Indirect Method)

• What it is: This involves directly asking the client (if they have sufficient verbal skills) or significant others (like parents, caregivers, or teachers) about the individual’s preferences.
• How it works:
  • Open-Ended Questions: “What kinds of things do you really like to do?” “What are your favorite toys/snacks/activities?”
  • Choice Format: “Would you rather play video games or go outside?” “Do you like crackers or pretzels better?”
  • Rank Ordering: “Here’s a list of activities: playing ball, watching TV, listening to music. Can you tell me which one is your favorite, your next favorite, and your least favorite?”
  • Surveys/Questionnaires: Using pre-made forms like the Reinforcement Assessment for Individuals with Severe Disabilities (RAISD).
• Pros: Relatively quick and easy to implement. Can gather a broad range of potential preferences. Involving caregivers can build rapport.
• Cons: It’s an indirect method. What people say they like isn’t always what they will choose or work for. Verbal reports can be unreliable, especially for individuals with limited communication skills or younger children. Caregiver reports can also be inaccurate sometimes.
• Example: You sit down with 10-year-old David and ask, “Hey David, what are some cool things you like to do after school?” He tells you, “Video games, skateboarding, and eating pizza.” You jot these down as potential preferences. You might also ask his mom, “What toys or activities does David seem to enjoy most?” She might add, “He loves building with LEGOs and watching superhero movies.”

2. Free Operant Observation

• What it is: This involves observing the individual in an environment where they have free access to a variety of potentially preferred items and activities. You simply watch and record what they choose to engage with and for how long.
• How it works:
  • Set up an environment (like a playroom or a specific area) with multiple items you think the client might like.
  • Allow the client to freely explore and interact with the items for a set period (e.g., 5-10 minutes).
  • You stay unobtrusive (don’t direct them or interact unless necessary for safety) and meticulously record which items they approach, touch, pick up, and spend time engaging with. The total duration spent with each item is often the key measure.
• Pros: Less structured, more naturalistic. Doesn’t require the client to give up items once chosen. Good for identifying preferences for activities that can’t easily be presented in pairs (like swinging vs. reading). Can reveal preferences the individual might not be able to verbalize.
• Cons: Might only identify preferences for items the person engages with for long durations; brief engagement with multiple items might be missed. Sometimes, a client might just stick with one item the whole time, not revealing other potential preferences. Requires careful setup and observation.
• Example: You bring 4-year-old Sarah into a playroom where you’ve placed a dollhouse, some picture books, a toy train set, bubbles, and play-doh. You sit quietly in the corner with a timer and data sheet. You observe Sarah walk over to the dollhouse and play with it for 3 minutes. Then she picks up a book and flips through it for 30 seconds. Finally, she spots the bubbles, brings them to you to open, and spends the remaining 6.5 minutes chasing bubbles. Your data suggests bubbles are a high preference, followed by the dollhouse, with books being a lower preference in this observation.

3. Trial-Based Methods (Direct Measurement)

These methods are more structured and involve presenting stimuli in distinct trials. They are often considered more accurate than indirect methods or free operant observations for ranking preferences.

a) Single Stimulus Preference Assessment (Successive Choice)

• What it is: Presenting one item at a time to the individual and recording their behavioral response (e.g., do they approach/reach for it, touch it, consume it, play with it?).
• How it works:
  1. Select several items you suspect might be preferred.
  2. Present one item to the individual.
  3. Record whether they interact with it (e.g., play, eat) or duration of interaction within a brief window (e.g., 5-10 seconds). Or simply record Approach/No Approach.
  4. Remove the item.
  5. Present the next item alone. Repeat for all items.
  6. Repeat the process several times, varying the order of presentation.
  7. Calculate the percentage of trials each item was approached or interacted with. Items approached on a higher percentage of trials are considered more preferred.
• Pros: Good for individuals who have difficulty making choices between two items or who might always grab for something, even if it’s not highly preferred. Can include items the individual might not spontaneously engage with in a free operant setting.
• Cons: May overestimate preference for items because the individual doesn’t have to choose it over something else. Can be time-consuming. Doesn’t produce a ranked order as clearly as paired or multiple stimulus methods.
• Example: You’re working with James, who has significant developmental delays. You present a light-up toy. He reaches for it and pushes the button. You record “Approach/Interact.” You remove it. Next, you present a small shaker toy. He looks at it but doesn’t reach. You record “No Approach.” You continue this for 5 different toys, repeating the sequence 3 times. You find James approached the light-up toy on 3/3 trials (100%) and a squishy ball on 2/3 trials (67%), suggesting these are higher preferences than the others.

b) Paired Stimulus Preference Assessment (Forced Choice)

What it is: Presenting two items at a time and asking the individual to choose one. Every item is paired with every other item in the set.

How it works:

Select a set of potential reinforcers (e.g., 5 items).

Present two items simultaneously to the individual (e.g., hold one in each hand, place them equidistant in front of the client).

Instruct the client to “Pick one” or “Which one do you want?”

Record which item the client points to, reaches for, or picks up. Allow brief access (e.g., 5-10 seconds) to the chosen item.

Continue presenting pairs until every item has been paired with every other item. (For 5 items, this means 10 pairs: A-B, A-C, A-D, A-E, B-C, B-D, B-E, C-D, C-E, D-E). Make sure to vary the position (left/right) of the items randomly.

Calculate the percentage of trials each item was chosen when presented. Items chosen more often are ranked higher in preference.

Pros: Considered one of the more accurate methods for creating a preference hierarchy (a ranked list). Forces a choice, which can clarify relative preference.

Cons: Can be time-consuming, especially with many items. Individuals need to be able to make a choice between two items. May trigger problem behavior if the client wants both items or if a highly preferred item is removed after brief access. Some individuals may show a “side bias” (always picking the item on the left or right).

Example: You’re assessing preferences for snacks with Lisa. You present a cracker and a piece of apple. Lisa points to the apple. You record “Apple” and let her take a bite. Next, you present the cracker and a small cookie. She points to the cookie. You record “Cookie” and let her have it. You continue this until all pairs (cracker-apple, cracker-cookie, cracker-grape, apple-cookie, apple-grape, cookie-grape) have been presented. You find she chose the cookie 3/3 times it was offered (100%), the apple 2/3 times (67%), the grape 1/3 times (33%), and the cracker 0/3 times (0%). This gives you a clear hierarchy: Cookie > Apple > Grape > Cracker.

c) Multiple Stimulus Preference Assessment

This category involves presenting multiple (three or more) items simultaneously in an array. There are two main variations:

Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement (MSWO)

What it is: Presenting an array of items, allowing the client to choose one, and then not replacing the chosen item in the array for the next trial.

How it works:

Select a set of items (e.g., 5-7).

Lay them out in a line in front of the client.

Instruct the client to “Pick one.”

Allow brief access to the chosen item, then remove it from the array.

Rearrange the remaining items.

Instruct the client to “Pick one” again from the smaller array.

Repeat until all items are chosen or the client stops choosing.

The order in which items are chosen creates the preference hierarchy (first chosen = highest preference, last chosen = lowest preference). Repeat the entire process a few times for reliability.

Pros: Efficient – often faster than paired stimulus. Produces a clear hierarchy. Good for clients who can scan an array and make a choice.

Cons: May trigger problem behavior when preferred items are removed and not returned immediately. Requires the client to be able to scan multiple items.

Example: You place 5 toys (car, block, dinosaur, puzzle piece, ball) in a line in front of Leo. “Pick one!” He grabs the dinosaur. You let him hold it briefly, then put it aside. You rearrange the remaining 4 toys. “Pick one!” He takes the car. You put it aside. You rearrange the remaining 3. “Pick one!” He takes the ball. Put it aside. Rearrange the last 2. “Pick one!” He takes the puzzle piece. The block is left. Your hierarchy for this session is: Dinosaur > Car > Ball > Puzzle Piece > Block.

Multiple Stimulus With Replacement (MSW)

What it is: Presenting an array of items, allowing the client to choose one, and then putting the chosen item back into the array for the next trial (potentially replacing an unchosen item with it or just adding it back).

How it works:

Select a set of items (e.g., 5-7).

Lay them out in a line.

Instruct the client to “Pick one.”

Allow brief access to the chosen item.

Place the chosen item back into the array and rearrange the items (or replace an unchosen item with the chosen one).

Instruct the client to “Pick one” again.

Repeat for a set number of trials.

Calculate the percentage of trials each item was chosen. Items chosen most often are highest preference.

Pros: Good for individuals who might engage in problem behavior when a preferred item isn’t returned. Allows for identifying a single, most-preferred item if the client consistently picks it.

Cons: Doesn’t create as clear a hierarchy of all items compared to MSWO, especially if the client keeps picking the same one or two items. Can sometimes overestimate the preference for the most-preferred item(s).

Example: You present the same 5 toys (car, block, dinosaur, puzzle piece, ball) to Leo. “Pick one!” He picks the car. You let him hold it, then put it back in the array, mixing up the positions. “Pick one!” He picks the car again. Put it back, mix. “Pick one!” He picks the dinosaur this time. Put it back, mix. After 10 trials, you find he picked the car 7 times (70%), the dinosaur 2 times (20%), and the ball 1 time (10%). This suggests the car is highly preferred, but it doesn’t tell you much about the relative preference between the block and puzzle piece in this assessment.

Helpful Tips for Conducting Preference Assessments

• Be Prepared: Gather your potential items before you start the assessment. Have your data collection sheet ready. Know which procedure you’re going to use.
• Vary the Items: Don’t just assess the same old toys or snacks every time. Include novel items! Preferences can change.
• Consider Different Categories: Think about assessing preferences across different types of stimuli: edible items, tangible items (toys), activities (playing a game, listening to music), social interaction (praise, tickles).
• Assess Frequently: Preferences aren’t static! What a child loves one week might be boring the next. Especially when first starting with a client, or if you notice your planned reinforcers aren’t working well, it’s time to do another preference assessment. How often depends on the client and your BCBA’s guidance, but it could be daily, weekly, or before challenging sessions.
• Keep Sessions Brief: Especially for trial-based methods, keep the assessment sessions relatively short to maintain the client’s motivation and avoid fatigue or satiation (getting tired of the items).
• Manage Problem Behavior: Have a plan, guided by your BCBA, for how to respond if the client gets upset when an item is removed or if they try to take items outside of the choice trial.
• Be Mindful of Satiation: If you’re using edible items, keep the portions very small so the client doesn’t get full before the assessment is over.
• Watch for Bias: Be aware of potential side bias in paired or multiple stimulus arrays. Vary item positions randomly.
• Follow Procedural Fidelity: Implement the chosen assessment method exactly as designed. Consistency is key for reliable results. Consult with your supervising BCBA if you’re unsure about any steps.
• It’s About Them, Not You: Remember, the goal is to identify the client’s preferences, not what you think they should like or what’s easiest for you to provide.

B-2: Assist with individualized assessment procedures (e.g., curriculum-based, developmental, social skills).

Let’s break down what this really means for you on the ground.

---

1. What Do We Mean by “Individualized Assessment Procedures”?

At its heart, individualized assessment means gathering specific information about a particular client’s skills, challenges, preferences, and needs. It’s the opposite of a one-size-fits-all approach. We’re not just giving everyone the same test; we’re using procedures specifically chosen or adapted by the supervising BCBA (Board Certified Behavior Analyst) or other qualified clinician to understand this unique person.

Think about it like this: If you were teaching someone to cook, you wouldn’t start everyone with baking a complex soufflé. You’d first figure out what they already know. Can they boil water? Do they know how to use measuring cups? Can they chop vegetables safely? That initial “figuring out” process is like an individualized assessment.

In the context of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), these assessments are designed to:

• Identify current skill levels: What can the client currently do? This establishes a baseline.
• Pinpoint skill deficits: What skills are missing or underdeveloped that are causing difficulties or limiting opportunities?
• Discover strengths and preferences: What is the client good at? What do they enjoy? This is vital for building rapport and identifying potential reinforcers.
• Guide intervention planning: The results directly inform the development of treatment goals and teaching strategies. The BCBA uses this data to decide what to teach and sometimes how to teach it.

Key takeaway: Individualized assessment is about tailoring the information-gathering process to the specific client to get the most accurate and useful picture possible.

---

2. Your Role: The “Assist” Part

This is absolutely critical to understand for your role and the RBT exam. As an RBT, you assist with assessments; you do not typically design them, choose them, or interpret the final results. That responsibility lies with your supervisor (the BCBA or equivalent).

So, what does “assisting” look like in practice? It can involve several important tasks, always under the direct guidance of your supervisor:

• Preparing the Environment: Ensuring the assessment space is free from distractions, comfortable for the client, and set up according to the assessment protocol.
• Gathering Materials: Collecting and organizing any specific items needed for the assessment (e.g., picture cards, toys, worksheets, timers, data sheets). Your supervisor will tell you exactly what’s required.
• Building Rapport: Helping the client feel comfortable and engaged before and during the assessment process. Your positive relationship can significantly impact the quality of the information gathered.
• Presenting Tasks or Questions (as directed): Your supervisor might ask you to present specific instructions or stimuli to the client according to the assessment protocol. For example, “Show Sarah these three pictures and ask her to point to the cat.”
• Collecting Data: This is a major part of your role. You’ll be accurately recording the client’s responses during the assessment. This might involve:
  • Marking items on a checklist (+/- for correct/incorrect).
  • Taking frequency data (how many times a behavior occurs).
  • Recording latency (how long it takes to respond).
  • Taking duration data (how long a behavior lasts).
  • Writing down verbatim responses or detailed observational notes exactly as instructed.
• Observing and Reporting: Objectively noting relevant behaviors or environmental factors during the assessment and reporting these observations factually to your supervisor. For example, “During the block-stacking task, Leo frequently looked out the window and needed three prompts to return his attention to the task.” (You report what happened, not why you think it happened).

Crucially, you typically do not:

• Choose which assessment to use.
• Modify assessment procedures without explicit instruction from your supervisor.
• Interpret the assessment results or draw conclusions about the client’s diagnosis or skill level.
• Develop treatment goals based on the assessment.

Your role is to be the reliable, precise, and objective hands, eyes, and ears for the supervising clinician during the assessment process.

---

3. Types of Assessments You Might Assist With (Examples from B-2)

The task list gives us three common categories. Let’s explore them:

• a) Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA):
  • Definition: CBAs measure a client’s skills directly in relation to a specific curriculum or set of learning objectives. Think of it like a pre-test for a specific course of study.
  • Purpose: To determine where the client currently stands within that curriculum, identify mastered skills, and pinpoint the next logical skills to target for instruction. It helps answer the question, “What should we teach next?”
  • Examples in ABA: You will very likely encounter tools like the VB-MAPP (Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program) or the ABLLS-R (Assessment of Basic Language and Learning Skills – Revised). These are comprehensive tools that break down language, learning, and social skills into small, teachable steps.
  • Your Assisting Role (Example): Your supervisor might be conducting a VB-MAPP assessment. They might hand you a specific section (e.g., testing listener responding) and instruct you: “Present these specific objects [toy car, block, cup] and ask Maya to ‘Give me the [object name]’. Record a ‘+’ if she gives you the correct one within 5 seconds, and a ‘-‘ if not.” You would then present the items exactly as instructed and record the data precisely on the provided form.
• b) Developmental Assessment:
  • Definition: Developmental assessments compare a client’s skills (across various domains like motor, communication, cognitive, adaptive behavior) to typically developing peers of the same chronological age. They look at developmental milestones.
  • Purpose: To understand the client’s overall developmental trajectory, identify potential developmental delays or disabilities, and provide a broad picture of strengths and weaknesses relative to age expectations.
  • Examples: While formal developmental assessments (like the Bayley Scales of Infant Development or the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales) are typically administered by psychologists or specialized clinicians, elements might be incorporated into an ABA assessment battery. A BCBA might use checklists based on developmental milestones or observe skills related to typical development.
  • Your Assisting Role (Example): A supervisor might be assessing fine motor skills relevant to a 3-year-old’s developmental level. They might ask you to set up an activity like stacking small blocks or stringing large beads and then instruct you to record how many blocks the child successfully stacks or how long it takes them to string five beads, perhaps also noting their grasp pattern or signs of frustration.
• c) Social Skills Assessment:
  • Definition: These assessments specifically evaluate a client’s ability to understand and navigate social situations, interact effectively with others, understand social cues, and form relationships.
  • Purpose: To identify specific strengths and deficits in social understanding and behavior to guide social skills training programs. This could cover areas like conversation skills, perspective-taking, emotional recognition, cooperation, and play skills.
  • Examples: This might involve direct observation in natural settings (like during playtime with peers), structured interviews (conducted by the BCBA), rating scales completed by parents or teachers, or contrived situations set up to observe specific social responses (role-playing).
  • Your Assisting Role (Example): Your supervisor might be assessing a teenager’s ability to initiate conversations. They could set up a role-play scenario and instruct you: “During this 5-minute practice conversation with Alex, record the frequency of him asking open-ended questions and making eye contact using this data sheet.” You would then observe the interaction (perhaps participating as directed by the supervisor) and meticulously record the target behaviors.

---

4. Helpful Tips for Assisting with Assessments:

• Follow Instructions Precisely: Assessments often have standardized procedures. Adhere exactly to your supervisor’s instructions regarding what to say, what materials to use, timing, and how to record data. Consistency is key for reliable results.
• Be Objective: Record exactly what you see and hear, not your opinions or interpretations. Report “Client threw the block” rather than “Client got angry and threw the block.”
• Maintain Confidentiality: Assessment information is sensitive. Treat all client information with the utmost confidentiality, following HIPAA guidelines and your organization’s policies.
• Communicate Clearly: If you are unsure about any instruction, ask your supervisor for clarification before proceeding. It’s better to ask than to collect incorrect data. Also, report any unusual occurrences during the assessment (e.g., fire drill interruption, client feeling unwell).
• Understand the “Why”: While you don’t interpret results, having a basic understanding of why a particular assessment is being done can help you be a more effective assistant. Don’t hesitate to ask your supervisor (at an appropriate time) about the purpose of the assessment you’re assisting with.

B-3: Assist with Functional Assessment Procedures

1. What is Functional Assessment (FA)? Let’s Define It.

Alright, first things first. At its core, Functional Assessment (often abbreviated as FA, though sometimes this term is used more specifically for Functional Analysis, which we’ll discuss later – context is key!) is a systematic process used by behavior analysts to identify the probable function or purpose of a specific behavior.

Think about it: behavior doesn’t just happen out of the blue. It serves a purpose for the individual engaging in it. It occurs because it has worked in the past to produce a desired outcome or consequence in a particular environmental context. Functional assessment is the set of methods we use to figure out what that purpose is.

We’re essentially asking: Why is this behavior occurring? What does the individual “get” out of doing this? What environmental variables are maintaining this behavior?

The ultimate goal is to develop a hypothesis (an educated guess) about the relationship between the challenging behavior and the environment. Understanding this relationship is critical because it allows the BCBA to design interventions that are function-based. That means the intervention directly addresses the “why” behind the behavior, making it much more likely to be effective and ethical. Trying to change behavior without understanding its function is like trying to fix a car without knowing what’s wrong under the hood – you might get lucky, but you’re mostly just guessing.

2. The Big Four: Common Functions of Behavior

Before we dive into how we assess function, let’s review what those potential functions usually are. In the world of ABA, we typically categorize the functions of behavior into four main types. A helpful mnemonic is SEAT or EATS:

• Sensory / Automatic Reinforcement:
  • What it means: The behavior itself produces a reinforcing sensation, or it terminates an unpleasant sensation. It feels good, or stops something that feels bad, independent of anyone else’s reaction. The reinforcement comes directly from the act itself.
  • Think: Sometimes referred to as “automatic” because it doesn’t require social mediation (someone else delivering the reinforcement).
  • Examples: Scratching an itch (relieves the unpleasant sensation), hand-flapping that produces visual stimulation, humming that creates auditory feedback, nail-biting that reduces tension.
  • Key Question: Does the person do this even when they’re alone? Does it seem internally driven?
• Escape / Avoidance:
  • What it means: The behavior results in delaying or completely avoiding something the individual finds unpleasant or aversive. This could be a task, a person, a setting, or even internal stimulation.
  • Think: Getting out of something unwanted.
  • Examples: A student ripping up a worksheet to avoid doing math problems, a child having a tantrum when told it’s time for bed to delay going, someone leaving a crowded room because it’s overwhelming.
  • Key Question: Does the behavior tend to happen when a demand is placed or when a specific (often unpleasant) situation arises? Does the behavior stop when the demand/situation is removed?
• Attention:
  • What it means: The behavior results in gaining attention from others (peers, adults). This attention can be positive (praise, smiles) or negative (reprimands, lectures, even looks of concern). For someone seeking attention, any attention can be better than none.
  • Think: Getting noticed by others.
  • Examples: A child making silly noises when adults are talking, someone exaggerating an injury to get sympathy, a student acting out in class resulting in the teacher coming over.
  • Key Question: Does the behavior tend to happen when the person’s preferred people are not interacting with them? Does the behavior result in others looking at, talking to, or approaching the person?
• Tangible / Access:
  • What it means: The behavior results in gaining access to a preferred item, activity, or resource.
  • Think: Getting something desirable.
  • Examples: A child crying until given a cookie, someone grabbing a toy from another person, a student disrupting class until allowed to use the computer.
  • Key Question: Does the behavior tend to happen when the person has been denied access to something they want? Does the behavior result in them getting that item or activity?

Understanding these four functions is crucial because the assessment procedures your supervisor uses are designed to figure out which one (or sometimes, which combination) is driving the behavior.

3. Types of Functional Assessment Methods & Your Role

Functional assessment isn’t just one single activity. It’s an umbrella term that covers several methods, typically categorized by how directly they involve observing and manipulating behavior. Your supervisor will decide which methods are appropriate, and your role will vary depending on the method.

Strict adherence to the protocol is critical for the validity of the FA. You must follow your supervisor’s instructions to the letter and seek clarification if anything is unclear. Never improvise or change the procedures.

a) Indirect Functional Assessments:

What they are: These methods involve gathering information about the behavior without directly observing it as it happens. They rely on recollections and reports from people familiar with the individual and the behavior.

Examples:

Interviews: Structured or semi-structured conversations with the client (if appropriate), parents, teachers, caregivers, and sometimes even the RBT (you!). Your supervisor might ask you about your observations, when you typically see the behavior, what happens before and after, etc.

Questionnaires & Rating Scales: Standardized forms like the Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS), Questions About Behavioral Function (QABF), or the Functional Analysis Screening Tool (FAST). These ask specific questions designed to point towards potential functions.

Your Role as an RBT:

You might be asked by your supervisor to participate in an interview, providing your observations and experiences with the client. Be honest, objective, and stick to what you’ve observed.

You might be asked to give questionnaires or checklists to caregivers or teachers as directed by your supervisor.

Crucially: You generally do not interpret the results of these indirect measures. That’s the supervisor’s role. Your job is to provide accurate information if asked, or help distribute/collect materials as instructed.

b) Descriptive Functional Assessments (Direct Observation):

What they are: These methods involve directly observing the behavior in the natural environment where it typically occurs and recording information about the surrounding circumstances. We’re watching the behavior happen “in the wild.”

Examples:

ABC Data Collection: This is a cornerstone and where RBTs often play a major role. You record the Antecedent (what happened just before the behavior), the Behavior itself (an objective description of exactly what the person did, based on the operational definition), and the Consequence (what happened immediately after the behavior). This provides a running record of the behavior in its natural context.

Scatterplot Analysis: Recording when the behavior occurs across different times of day, activities, or settings. This helps identify patterns (e.g., “The behavior only seems to happen during math class,” or “It’s most frequent right before lunch”). You might fill out a grid marking occurrences during specific time intervals.

Your Role as an RBT:

This is where your skills in objective observation and accurate data collection are paramount!

You will likely be asked to collect ABC data frequently. Your supervisor will rely heavily on the quality of this data. Be precise, objective, and timely in your recording. Describe what you see and hear, not your interpretations (e.g., record “Client threw pencil and yelled ‘No!’” instead of “Client got angry and defiant”).

You might be asked to collect scatterplot data, carefully tracking occurrences during specified periods.

You need to be proficient in using the data collection systems specified by your supervisor (paper and pencil, electronic apps, etc.).

Again, you collect the data; your supervisor analyzes it to look for patterns suggesting a potential function.

c) Functional Analysis (FA) (Experimental Manipulation):

What it is: This is the most rigorous type of functional assessment. It involves systematically manipulating antecedents and consequences within controlled conditions to experimentally test hypothesized functions. It’s like running mini-experiments to see which conditions reliably evoke the behavior.

How it works (simplified): The BCBA designs specific conditions (e.g., an “Attention” condition where attention is withheld unless the behavior occurs, an “Escape” condition where demands are presented and removed if the behavior occurs, an “Alone/Ignore” condition to test for automatic reinforcement, and a “Control/Play” condition where reinforcement is freely available). The rate of the target behavior is measured in each condition. The condition where the behavior occurs most frequently strongly suggests the function.

Your Role as an RBT:

Functional Analyses are conducted only under the close supervision and direction of a qualified BCBA due to the complexities and ethical considerations (we might be briefly reinforcing challenging behavior).

Your role here is assisting with the implementation of the specific conditions exactly as designed and trained by your supervisor.

This might involve:

Setting up the environment for specific conditions.

Presenting demands or withholding attention precisely as instructed.

Delivering specific consequences if the behavior occurs, according to the protocol for that condition (e.g., providing brief attention in the Attention condition).

Accurately and immediately recording the frequency or duration of the behavior during these sessions.